10,889,045 research outputs found

    Bounds for modified Struve functions of the first kind and their ratios

    Get PDF
    We obtain a simple two-sided inequality for the ratio Lν(x)/Lν1(x)\mathbf{L}_\nu(x)/\mathbf{L}_{\nu-1}(x) in terms of the ratio Iν(x)/Iν1(x)I_\nu(x)/I_{\nu-1}(x), where Lν(x)\mathbf{L}_\nu(x) is the modified Struve function of the first kind and Iν(x)I_\nu(x) is the modified Bessel function of the first kind. This result allows one to use the extensive literature on bounds for Iν(x)/Iν1(x)I_\nu(x)/I_{\nu-1}(x) to immediately deduce bounds for Lν(x)/Lν1(x)\mathbf{L}_\nu(x)/\mathbf{L}_{\nu-1}(x). We note some consequences and obtain further bounds for Lν(x)/Lν1(x)\mathbf{L}_\nu(x)/\mathbf{L}_{\nu-1}(x) by adapting techniques used to bound the ratio Iν(x)/Iν1(x)I_\nu(x)/I_{\nu-1}(x). We apply these results to obtain new bounds for the condition numbers xLν(x)/Lν(x)x\mathbf{L}_\nu'(x)/\mathbf{L}_\nu(x), the ratio Lν(x)/Lν(y)\mathbf{L}_\nu(x)/\mathbf{L}_\nu(y) and the modified Struve function Lν(x)\mathbf{L}_\nu(x) itself. Amongst other results, we obtain two-sided inequalities for xLν(x)/Lν(x)x\mathbf{L}_\nu'(x)/\mathbf{L}_\nu(x) and Lν(x)/Lν(y)\mathbf{L}_\nu(x)/\mathbf{L}_\nu(y) that are given in terms of xIν(x)/Iν(x)xI_\nu'(x)/I_\nu(x) and Iν(x)/Iν(y)I_\nu(x)/I_\nu(y), respectively, which again allows one to exploit the substantial literature on bounds for these quantities. The results obtained in this paper complement and improve existing bounds in the literature.Comment: 22 page

    Statistics of low energy excitations for the directed polymer in a 1+d1+d random medium (d=1,2,3d=1,2,3)

    Full text link
    We consider a directed polymer of length LL in a random medium of space dimension d=1,2,3d=1,2,3. The statistics of low energy excitations as a function of their size ll is numerically evaluated. These excitations can be divided into bulk and boundary excitations, with respective densities ρLbulk(E=0,l)\rho^{bulk}_L(E=0,l) and ρLboundary(E=0,l)\rho^{boundary}_L(E=0,l). We find that both densities follow the scaling behavior ρLbulk,boundary(E=0,l)=L1θdRbulk,boundary(x=l/L)\rho^{bulk,boundary}_L(E=0,l) = L^{-1-\theta_d} R^{bulk,boundary}(x=l/L), where θd\theta_d is the exponent governing the energy fluctuations at zero temperature (with the well-known exact value θ1=1/3\theta_1=1/3 in one dimension). In the limit x=l/L0x=l/L \to 0, both scaling functions Rbulk(x)R^{bulk}(x) and Rboundary(x)R^{boundary}(x) behave as Rbulk,boundary(x)x1θdR^{bulk,boundary}(x) \sim x^{-1-\theta_d}, leading to the droplet power law ρLbulk,boundary(E=0,l)l1θd\rho^{bulk,boundary}_L(E=0,l)\sim l^{-1-\theta_d} in the regime 1lL1 \ll l \ll L. Beyond their common singularity near x0x \to 0, the two scaling functions Rbulk,boundary(x)R^{bulk,boundary}(x) are very different : whereas Rbulk(x)R^{bulk}(x) decays monotonically for 0<x<10<x<1, the function Rboundary(x)R^{boundary}(x) first decays for 0<x<xmin0<x<x_{min}, then grows for xmin<x<1x_{min}<x<1, and finally presents a power law singularity Rboundary(x)(1x)σdR^{boundary}(x)\sim (1-x)^{-\sigma_d} near x1x \to 1. The density of excitations of length l=Ll=L accordingly decays as ρLboundary(E=0,l=L)Lλd\rho^{boundary}_L(E=0,l=L)\sim L^{- \lambda_d} where λd=1+θdσd\lambda_d=1+\theta_d-\sigma_d. We obtain λ10.67\lambda_1 \simeq 0.67, λ20.53\lambda_2 \simeq 0.53 and λ30.39\lambda_3 \simeq 0.39, suggesting the possible relation λd=2θd\lambda_d= 2 \theta_d.Comment: 15 pages, 25 figure

    Effective non-vanishing of global sections of multiple adjoint bundles for polarized 3-folds

    Get PDF
    Let XX be a smooth complex projective variety of dimension three and let LL be an ample line bundle on XX. In this paper, we provide a lower bound of the dimension of the global sections of m(KX+L)m(K_{X}+L) under the assumption that κ(KX+L)\kappa(K_{X}+L) is non-negative. In particular, we get the following: (1) if κ(KX+L)\kappa(K_{X}+L) is greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to two, then h0(KX+L)h^{0}(K_{X}+L) is positive. (2) If κ(KX+L)\kappa(K_{X}+L) is equal to three, then h0(2(KX+L))h^{0}(2(K_{X}+L)) is greater than or equal to three. Moreover we get a classification of (X,L)(X,L) such that κ(KX+L)\kappa(K_{X}+L) is equal to three and h0(2(KX+L))h^{0}(2(K_{X}+L)) is equal to three or four.Comment: 25 page
    corecore